[MHml] Atlantic 42 (46?) capsize on Lake Michigan

Paul Nudd paulnudd at actionpotential.com.au
Tue Oct 31 08:37:29 EST 2006


Nothing to do with the capsize but did I see mini-keels + daggerboards?
I didn't know any cat used this config'. Surely the worst of both worlds?
I see the biggest advantage of daggerboards over mini-keels as being 
able to get them right up for beaching, shallow water navigation and 
safer downwind sailing.
PN

Glenn Brodie wrote:
> Likely operator error - they sailed it over on a gust/microburst - it 
> was a windy late fall day in 2004 on the Great Lakes and they were in 
> the pilot house on autopilot with all the sails up.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* multihulls-bounces at steamradio.com 
> [mailto:multihulls-bounces at steamradio.com] *On Behalf Of *David Vrona
> *Sent:* Monday, October 30, 2006 11:02 AM
> *To:* Informed discussion of multihull issues
> *Subject:* Re: [MHml] Atlantic 42 (46?) capsize on Lake Michigan
> 
> Does anybody remember anything about the cause?
> 
> On 10/29/06, *K38BOB at aol.com <mailto:K38BOB at aol.com>* <K38BOB at aol.com 
> <mailto:K38BOB at aol.com>> wrote:
> 
>     the link shows a 2004 date.
>     bob
>      
>     In a message dated 10/27/2006 7:57:06 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
>     ceilydh at 3web.net <mailto:ceilydh at 3web.net> writes:
> 
>         http://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5486
> 
>         Reading the whole thread, my guess would be a microburst.  Can't
>         see any
>         wave action making this big a cat flip
> 
>         Evan Gatehouse


More information about the Multihulls mailing list