[MHml] Atlantic 42 (46?) capsize on Lake Michigan
Paul Nudd
paulnudd at actionpotential.com.au
Tue Oct 31 08:37:29 EST 2006
Nothing to do with the capsize but did I see mini-keels + daggerboards?
I didn't know any cat used this config'. Surely the worst of both worlds?
I see the biggest advantage of daggerboards over mini-keels as being
able to get them right up for beaching, shallow water navigation and
safer downwind sailing.
PN
Glenn Brodie wrote:
> Likely operator error - they sailed it over on a gust/microburst - it
> was a windy late fall day in 2004 on the Great Lakes and they were in
> the pilot house on autopilot with all the sails up.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* multihulls-bounces at steamradio.com
> [mailto:multihulls-bounces at steamradio.com] *On Behalf Of *David Vrona
> *Sent:* Monday, October 30, 2006 11:02 AM
> *To:* Informed discussion of multihull issues
> *Subject:* Re: [MHml] Atlantic 42 (46?) capsize on Lake Michigan
>
> Does anybody remember anything about the cause?
>
> On 10/29/06, *K38BOB at aol.com <mailto:K38BOB at aol.com>* <K38BOB at aol.com
> <mailto:K38BOB at aol.com>> wrote:
>
> the link shows a 2004 date.
> bob
>
> In a message dated 10/27/2006 7:57:06 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> ceilydh at 3web.net <mailto:ceilydh at 3web.net> writes:
>
> http://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5486
>
> Reading the whole thread, my guess would be a microburst. Can't
> see any
> wave action making this big a cat flip
>
> Evan Gatehouse
More information about the Multihulls
mailing list