[MHml] [jordan drogue
Peter Southwood
peter.southwood at telkomsa.net
Fri Nov 24 01:31:50 EST 2006
That is another thing entirely, and at this stage I see no obvious reason why it shouldnt work.. It may be a bit of an awkward thing to handle, and if large enough, each cone will probably need reinforcing around the edge.
You may need slightly more total frontal area because the further cones will be in the wake of the nearer ones, but if it works as a true sea anchor, ie the speed is very low, this may not be a significant effect.
Try one and let us know, I think it would be a good experiment. As a first estimate I would suggest keeping the length the same as that recommended for the Jordan drogue for the vessel size, but with combined frontal area about equal to that for a parachute anchor for the same boat. The distance between cones would probably scale with the cone diameter.
Cheers,
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: rob dalton
To: Informed discussion of multihull issues
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 1:19 AM
Subject: Re: [MHml] [jordan drogue
No argument with this, but was considering a separate, larger-diameter Jordan-style drogue instead of a sea anchor.
Robert
Peter Southwood <peter.southwood at telkomsa.net> wrote:
Hi Rob,
As I understand it the length is important to keep the line immersed and in unbroken water at all times. If it is shortened too much it may fail.
Cheers,
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: rob dalton
To: Informed discussion of multihull issues
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 6:40 AM
Subject: Re: [MHml] [jordan drogue
I was tawling through the archives and came up wit the discussion of Jordan drogues and parachutes, wher someone suggested using a Jordan drogue as the line to tether the chute. It makes sense to me except that the drogue would have to be retrieved before the chute could be deployed.
I was wondering about the optimum size of drogue. The present size on a Jordan drogue seems to work but I couldn't see any work done on optimising the diameter. They seemed to have a guess that worked and left it at that. If the dorgues were larger, then the length of line needed would be less. Double the diameter, halve the number and you double the area. Possibly a series of larger drogues could take the place of a parachute if the drogues were sufficiently large, removing the problems of deflating with waves and damping down yawing,
Robert
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Alter your subscription details or unsubscribe at the bottom of this page:
http://www.steamradio.com/mailman/listinfo/multihulls
Multihulls mailing list (Multihulls at steamradio.com)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.7/538 - Release Date: 2006/11/18
_______________________________________________
Alter your subscription details or unsubscribe at the bottom of this page:
http://www.steamradio.com/mailman/listinfo/multihulls
Multihulls mailing list (Multihulls at steamradio.com)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inbox full of spam? Get leading spam protection and 1GB storage with All New Yahoo! Mail.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Alter your subscription details or unsubscribe at the bottom of this page:
http://www.steamradio.com/mailman/listinfo/multihulls
Multihulls mailing list (Multihulls at steamradio.com)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.7/538 - Release Date: 2006/11/18
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://steamradio.com/pipermail/multihulls/attachments/20061123/23f8afff/attachment.htm
More information about the Multihulls
mailing list